Guidelines tightened for self-employed borrowers

| Tuesday, 9 March 2010

CMHC is tightening the criteria needed for self-employed borrowers to get mortgage insurance, changes that will come into effect on April 9, according to Canadian Mortgage Trends.
 
Borrowers who apply under CMHC's self-employed stated income product will need a 10 per cent down payment instead of the five per cent down payment now required. These borrowers will also only be able to refinance up to 85 per cent loan to value instead of 90 per cent.

Debbie Thomas, partner and broker of record at The Mortgage Group, recently told CMP she has noticed a trend of insurance guidelines tightening for self-employed borrowers, who often write off a large portion of their income for tax purposes.

"The whole issue of reasonability has now been forced back and self-employed deals that used to be approved are not even close to being approved today," said Thomas. "It hasn't been an announcement or anything that has come out from the lenders or insurers, but it's something we've definitely noticed."

 

 




Common Sense - Not large enough voice | 11/03/2010 2:19 PM
Don't you wonder what happened to common sense? Where did it happen that everyone is running with their tails between their legs trying to cover their over sized butts?
Financial Planners & CA's - Dave | 11/03/2010 3:39 PM
So you can hide from the taxman, have a great net worth, own lots of assets and not buy a house. People that have good accountants and financial planners get screwed. Tell me how does the doctor making 500,000 showing the govt that he makes 30,000 amass all his assets without being shrewd.
confusing - Mukesh | 11/03/2010 4:53 PM
what's most confusing is that cmhc issued an "advice" to lenders that bfs clients who are self employed for more than 3 years cannot qualify under the bfs programs after April/2010.....only bfs clients in their 1st to 3rd years of running their business can qualify under their bfs program ??????

Who came up with this one? And how does this make any sense at all.

BFS clients who have been running their businesses for 3+ years sucessfully, which is no small feat, are now being penalized for being able to keep their businesses up and running.
Confused as well.... - Karen | 12/03/2010 6:38 AM
I was really puzzled myself about this change when I read the CMHC outline. I thought that the purpose of tightening up guidelines was to reduce risk. For the life of me I can't see how this reduces the risk by allowing new BFS to remain and established BFS disallowed? Is it the government trying to make sure that if you are BFS that they get you to claim more income, spend less developing your business, so that you pay more taxes...? So along with this comes a very mixed message... New growth in a country/economy requires new companies to get ESTABLISHED... and then once they are established there is employment growth all because some hard working BFS struggled, worked 20 hours a day, kept doing the right things, spent his/her money to develop their business and now... can't by a house.... Hmmm there is a puzzle...That was my first thought. Oh well... Maybe common sense will come back.....some day...We can only hope.
Clearly the Government Runs CMHC? - Elfie | 12/03/2010 7:45 AM
Why is CMHC making it so tough for the self employed to get financing when they are proving to be one of the largest growing segments of the Canadian employment realm. They could have raised the beacon scores and accomplished a better result. I'm a small business woman who's built a mortgage company from scratch for the past two years. I employ 7 people in total. They have a great place to work and they work hard. Just when I know that all the my hard work paid off and I have a legitimate business that's making money, I might not be able to buy a house for the family that's made all the sacrifices while I worked my tail feathers off. But CMHC is willing to bet on the newcomer? Pretty soon they'll kill the Real Estate market with these foolish changes. The one thing that sustained Canada during this recent Recession.
It's rate too! - Ann | 13/03/2010 5:41 AM
CMHC has given two different statements in two different notices, 145 and 146. One says 5 year fixed terms must qualify at the greater of posted or contract rate the other says 5 year fixed terms qualify at the contracted rate. No one in government or CMHC has thought any of this through, they have just jumped to big banking's whip and the Canadian home owner/purchaser be damned.
Other CMHC Changes - Karen | 15/03/2010 4:04 AM
Elfie....Good for you... You are what I am talking about and thank you for your response.
Dan's comment - Dan | 16/03/2010 6:01 PM
BTW - Any news on Genworth ALt-A or AIG Low Doc?

Add....

Broker news welcomes your comments. Please note that comments may be edited and inappropriate comments will be removed. Comments are unmoderated. If you have a question, please email the editor.
Name *
Comment title
Comment *

Ckick here to close
Pacific NA, a financial services company founded and run by MortgageBrokers.com CEO Alex Haditaghi, has acquired Mortgage Architects and its lending arm, myNext Mortgage Company.

Dominion Lending Centres has signed on Canadian hockey commentator Don Cherry for its new TV commercials, launching September 2010.

CMP asks you... Who is Canada's most broker-friendly lender?

CanEquity says it's offering the lowest mortgage rate in Canada, lower than its 3.81 per cent rate.

Canadian home buyers can opt for a little peace of mind with the introduction of job loss insurance coverage on mortgages by the Nova Scotia companies Fraser & Hoyt Benefits and Propel Insure.